Aretha Franklin, the undisputed Queen of Soul, surprised many when she covered Adele’s global hit, “Rolling in the Deep,” for her album “Aretha Franklin Sings the Great Diva Classics.” While the album aimed to celebrate iconic female vocalists, the inclusion of a relatively recent song like “Rolling in the Deep” sparked debate. Was it a commercially driven choice, or did Aretha bring a unique dimension to Adele’s modern classic? The release of Aretha’s version ignited discussions and divided opinions: “Adele’s original is untouchable!” some declared, while others questioned if Aretha’s rendition could surpass the contemporary chart-topper. But is it truly a competition? And what can a deep dive into both versions tell us about these incredible artists and their interpretations of the same powerful song by Adele, “Rolling in the Deep”?
adele-aretha_article_story_large
Image showing Adele and Aretha Franklin side-by-side, representing a visual comparison of the two artists.
Let’s be clear: Adele’s “Rolling in the Deep” is a powerhouse in its own right. As the original songwriter, her connection to the lyrics and melody is undeniable. However, Aretha Franklin’s legendary status comes from her unparalleled ability to reinterpret songs, often elevating them to new heights. Think of her transformative covers of “Respect,” “Son of a Preacher Man,” and “Bridge Over Troubled Water”—songs she made indelibly her own. The question isn’t necessarily about ‘better’ or ‘worse,’ but about understanding the distinct approaches each artist brings to “Rolling in the Deep.” To truly appreciate the nuances, we need to dissect key elements of both versions, from production choices to vocal delivery and emotional resonance. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison to explore what makes each rendition unique and compelling.
Auto-Tune in Aretha’s “Rolling in the Deep” Cover: A Production Choice?
One of the immediate points of contention surrounding Aretha Franklin’s version of “Rolling in the Deep” is the noticeable use of auto-tune. For some listeners, this modern production technique felt jarring and unnecessary, especially for an artist of Aretha’s caliber. The intention might have been to give the track a contemporary edge, aligning it with current pop sensibilities. However, the prominent auto-tune raises questions. Was it simply a stylistic choice, or was it employed for pitch correction?
Given Aretha Franklin’s storied career and vocal prowess, the idea of pitch correction seems unlikely. She is renowned for her vocal accuracy and control. It’s more plausible that the auto-tune was a production decision aimed at creating a specific sonic texture. Regardless of the intent, the execution is debatable. Many critics and listeners felt the auto-tune was too heavy-handed and detracted from the raw, soulful power expected from the Queen of Soul. This production choice stands in stark contrast to Adele’s original, which prioritizes a more organic and less processed vocal sound, emphasizing the emotional rawness of her performance.
Emotional Connection and Interpretation: Adele’s Vulnerability vs. Aretha’s Soulful Authority
When comparing Adele and Aretha’s versions of “Rolling in the Deep,” emotional connection becomes a central point of discussion. Adele, as the songwriter, inherently brings a personal vulnerability and rawness to the song. Her performance is often described as heart-wrenching, conveying the pain and anger of heartbreak directly from her own experience. This authenticity resonates deeply with listeners, contributing to the song’s massive global appeal.
Aretha Franklin, on the other hand, approaches “Rolling in the Deep” with a different kind of emotional depth – one rooted in her gospel and soul traditions. While she didn’t write the song, her interpretation draws upon a lifetime of conveying profound emotions through music. Her version channels soulful authority and resilience. Instead of vulnerability, Aretha delivers a performance imbued with strength and a seasoned understanding of heartbreak and overcoming adversity. Both singers connect emotionally, but through different lenses shaped by their unique artistic backgrounds and personal experiences. This difference in emotional delivery is a key factor in how listeners perceive and respond to each version of the song by Adele, “Rolling in the Deep.”
Musicianship and Interpretive Artistry: Beyond Vocal Performance
Beyond vocal delivery, examining the musicianship and interpretive artistry of both Adele and Aretha Franklin reveals further distinctions in their approaches to “Rolling in the Deep.” Adele’s musicianship is evident in her songwriting. She crafts songs that are both personal and universally relatable, and her performance of “Rolling in the Deep” is faithful to the original intent and emotional core of the song.
Aretha Franklin’s musicianship shines in her unparalleled ability to reinterpret and transform existing songs. Her career is filled with examples of covers that became definitive versions, showcasing her genius for arrangement and improvisation. With “Rolling in the Deep,” she doesn’t simply replicate Adele’s version. Instead, she reimagines it through a soul lens, incorporating gospel-infused vocal runs and improvisations, and even weaving in elements of “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough” in her live performances. This highlights her improvisational skills and her innate musicality, demonstrating how she can take a contemporary pop song and infuse it with her signature soul and gospel stylings. While Adele’s strength lies in authentic songwriting and performance, Aretha’s genius is in transformative interpretation and musical reinvention.
Vocal Prowess: Contrasting Styles and Techniques
Comparing the vocal prowess of Adele and Aretha Franklin when they sing “Rolling in the Deep” is an exercise in appreciating two vastly different, yet equally impressive, vocal styles. Aretha Franklin is a dramatic mezzo-soprano, known for her immense vocal power, expansive range, and intricate melismatic runs. Her voice possesses a naturally larger volume and a metallic resonance that can command attention. Even at a later stage in her career, her vocal technique, honed over decades, remains remarkable.
Adele, classified as a lyric mezzo-soprano, has a voice characterized by its rich, husky tone and emotive delivery. While her range and technical agility may not match Aretha’s, Adele’s strength lies in her ability to convey raw emotion and connect with listeners through the timbre and texture of her voice. Her vocal style is more grounded and less overtly virtuosic than Aretha’s, focusing on conveying intimacy and vulnerability.
In “Rolling in the Deep,” these vocal differences are pronounced. Aretha’s version showcases her powerful belts and improvisational runs, demonstrating her technical command. Adele’s rendition emphasizes the song’s emotional core through her distinctive vocal tone and phrasing. To declare one “better” is subjective and misses the point. It’s about appreciating the unique vocal gifts and stylistic choices each artist brings to the song by Adele, “Rolling in the Deep.”
Live Performance: Energy and Stage Presence
The live performances of “Rolling in the Deep” by Adele and Aretha Franklin further highlight their contrasting artistic approaches. Adele’s live performances are known for their emotional intensity and stripped-down arrangements, focusing on her vocals and the raw emotion of the song. Her stage presence is often understated, allowing the music to speak for itself.
Aretha Franklin, in contrast, brings a dynamic and theatrical energy to her live performances. Her rendition of “Rolling in the Deep” on Letterman, for example, showcases her ability to command a stage and engage an audience with her powerful vocals and improvisational flair. Even acknowledging that the live performance occurred later in her career, her stage presence and ability to connect with the audience remain undeniable. The inclusion of “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough” within “Rolling in the Deep” during live performances further exemplifies her improvisational genius and her ability to create a captivating and uniquely “Aretha” live experience.
While Adele’s live performances prioritize emotional intimacy, Aretha’s are about showcasing vocal power and stage presence, each offering a distinct and compelling experience for the audience.
Conclusion: Two Queens, Two Interpretations of a Song by Adele “Rolling in the Deep”
Ultimately, comparing Adele’s original “Rolling in the Deep” to Aretha Franklin’s cover is not about finding a definitive “better” version. It’s about celebrating the unique talents and artistic perspectives of two iconic vocalists. Adele’s original is a masterpiece of contemporary songwriting and vulnerable performance, resonating with millions through its raw emotion and relatability. Aretha Franklin’s cover, on the other hand, is a testament to her enduring vocal power, improvisational genius, and ability to transform any song into a soulful tour-de-force.
Both versions offer valuable insights into the artistry of these incredible women. Adele’s “Rolling in the Deep” is a defining song of the 21st century, and Aretha Franklin’s interpretation serves as a reminder of her legendary status and her unparalleled ability to make any song her own. Instead of asking “who sang it better?”, perhaps the question should be “what can we learn about vocal artistry and musical interpretation by listening to both?” Each version stands as a powerful testament to the enduring impact of “Rolling in the Deep” and the remarkable talents of Adele and Aretha Franklin.
